GX3 PRO GK vs Fengon IX7 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200
Dimensions
5
7
16"
20"
4005
/
1760
/
1575
/
2480
/
Fuel Economy
15
10.9
/
70
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
3.5"
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Leather
Leather
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
2
8
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
Transmission
CVT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Electric
/
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.5
TBD
100 BHP - 102
231
CVT
AT
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
/
Gasoline
Gasoline
102
231
140
355
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GX3 PRO GK
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Fengon IX7
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Limiter
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGX3 PRO GK
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GX3 PRO GK if you care more about price; choose Fengon IX7 if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GX3 PRO GK has a fuel consumption of 6.67, while Fengon IX7 has a fuel consumption of 9.17. Therefore, GX3 PRO GK is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GX3 PRO GK has a wheelbase of 2480, while Fengon IX7 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GX3 PRO GK uses No data, while Fengon IX7 uses Four-Wheel Drive.