H2 1.5T Intelligent vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
161 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4335 mm
4341 mm
1814 mm
1804 mm
1695 mm
1693 mm
2560 mm
2676 mm
500 L
414 L
Fuel Economy
12.2 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
55 L
50 L
12.2 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
147 BHP - 150 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
1.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
148 BHP
115 BHP
210 Nm
156 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
H2 1.5T Intelligent
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickH2 1.5T Intelligent
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose H2 1.5T Intelligent if you care more about price; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, H2 1.5T Intelligent has a fuel consumption of 8.2, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, H2 1.5T Intelligent has a wheelbase of 2560 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. H2 1.5T Intelligent uses Front Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.