H2 1.5T Intelligent vs Omoda C7 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4335 mm
4660
1814 mm
1875
1695 mm
1670
2560 mm
2720
500 L
/
/
1578
/
19"
/
176
Fuel Economy
12.2 Km/L
13.3
55 L
51
12.2 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
Interior
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
15.6"
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
8.88"
/
√
/
Front Row Seats
/
√
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
√
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
/
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
/
Macpherson Strut
/
Multilink
Wheels/brakes
/
Ventilated Disk
/
Ventilated Disk
/
Disk
/
235/50 R19
/
235/50 R19
Key Spec
1.5 L
-
147 BHP - 150 BHP
195 HP - 341 HP
Automatic
7DCT & DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.6
Gasoline
Gasoline
148 BHP
195 HP
210 Nm
290
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO / NORMAL / SPORT
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
H2 1.5T Intelligent
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Omoda C7 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose H2 1.5T Intelligent if you care more about price; choose Omoda C7 Comfort if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, H2 1.5T Intelligent has a fuel consumption of 8.2, while Omoda C7 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, Omoda C7 Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, H2 1.5T Intelligent has a wheelbase of 2560 mm, while Omoda C7 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Omoda C7 Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. H2 1.5T Intelligent uses Front Wheel Drive, while Omoda C7 Comfort uses No data.