H6 Active vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
/
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
/
1930 mm
/
1927 mm
/
2750 mm
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
14.9 km/L
10 Km/L
/
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Yes
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
10.25 Inch
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
4
/
No
/
es
/
Yes
✓
Yes
✓
Yes
✓
Yes
/
Yes
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8 + DTS
9
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/60 R18
/
225/60 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.4 L
2.0 L
147 BHP - 235
223 BHP - 342 BHP
7DCT & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
Turbocharged
/
4
4
DOHC
/
201 HP @ 6000-6300 rpm
224 BHP
105
/
320 Nm @ 1500-4000 rpm
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
Yes
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Yes
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
H6 Active
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose H6 Active if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, H6 Active has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, H6 Active is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, H6 Active has a wheelbase of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. H6 Active uses Front Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.