H6 Active vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison

Car Information

/

6.5

/

160+160

/

≥400

Engine / Motor

/

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

/

5209

/

2010

/

1731

/

3110

Fuel Economy

14.9 km/L

/

Comfort

/

Yes

/

/

/

/

Interior

10.25 Inch

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

4

/

No

es

Yes

Yes

/

Yes

/

Yes

/

Yes

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

8 + DTS

/

/

Transmission

7DCT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

225/60 R18

/

225/60 R18

/

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

/

201 BHP - 235

429 BHP - 543 BHP

7DCT & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 - 5

6 - 7 Seater

/

TBD

/

320 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0L

0.0 L

Gasoline

Electric

Turbocharge

/

Turbocharged

/

4

/

DOHC

/

201 HP @ 6000-6300 rpm

429 BHP

105

/

320 Nm @ 1500-4000 rpm

600

Technologies

Yes

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Yes

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • H6 Active

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
  • EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickH6 Active

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose H6 Active if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Haval | H6 Active

VS

Geely | EX5 Pro

Haval | H6 Active

VS

Hongqi | HS3 1.5T Luxury

Haval | H6 Active

VS

Peugeot | 2008 GT

Haval | H6 Active

VS

JAC | JS6 Flagship

Haval | H6 Active

VS

Jetour | X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, H6 Active has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, H6 Active has a wheelbase of No data, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. H6 Active uses Front Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.