H6 Active vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
170
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
/
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
/
1809
/
1653
/
2585
/
359/1166
/
145
Fuel Economy
14.9 km/L
17.2
/
45
Comfort
✓
/
Yes
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
Interior
10.25 Inch
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
4
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
No
/
es
/
Yes
/
Yes
✓
Yes
✓
Yes
/
Yes
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
8 + DTS
4
/
10.1
Transmission
7DCT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
/
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
Wheels/brakes
225/60 R18
215/55 R17
225/60 R18
215/55 R17
/
Disc
/
Disc
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.4 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
147 BHP - 235
112 BHP - 168
7DCT & Automatic
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
Engine
2.0L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
Turbocharged
/
4
/
DOHC
/
201 HP @ 6000-6300 rpm
118 BHP
105
88
320 Nm @ 1500-4000 rpm
180
Technologies
Yes
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Yes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
H6 Active
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
ZS 1.5L STD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose H6 Active if you care more about power; choose ZS 1.5L STD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, H6 Active has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while ZS 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, ZS 1.5L STD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, H6 Active has a wheelbase of No data, while ZS 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. H6 Active uses Front Drive, while ZS 1.5L STD uses Front Drive.