H6 GT 4WD vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
19
/
5
5 Doors
4714
4760 mm
1940
1930 mm
1729
1927 mm
165
224 m
/
2750 mm
/
400 L
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
/
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Intelligent Key
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.25
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Front Row Seats
/
LCD
/
Leather
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
12.3
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
8
9
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7
/
7-DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
235/55 R19
/
235/55 R19
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.0 L
201 BHP - 208 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
7-DCT
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.0L
/
208 BHP
224 BHP
325
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Race Mode + (standard/sport/ECO/snow/sand/off-road)
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
H6 GT 4WD
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Remote key types
- Front Cross Traffic Alert
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Active Safety Warning System
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose H6 GT 4WD if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, H6 GT 4WD has a fuel consumption of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, H6 GT 4WD has a wheelbase of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. H6 GT 4WD uses Four-Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.