H9 Mid vs 11 AWD Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

200 km/h

/

Chinese

Dimensions

7

5 Seater

4950 mm

4880 mm

1930 mm

1970 mm

1960 mm

1601 mm

2800 mm

2975 mm

750 L

545 L

/

5 Doors

Fuel Economy

/

/

90 L

/

9.1 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Vinyl Upholstery

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Sports

/

Safety

6

/

Front and Rear

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

14.6

10.25

8

/

/

/

/

Standard LCD

/

Transmission

AT

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

265/60 R18

/

265/60 R18

/

Key Spec

2.0 L

/

214 - 248 BHP

570 BHP - 599 BHP

AT & Automatic

TBD

Gasoline

Electric

TBD

/

7 - 7

5 Seater

/

TBD

/

650 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

214

599 BHP

380 Nm

650 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

13.5

/

options.Lithium

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • H9 Mid

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • ABS
  • 11 AWD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick11 AWD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose H9 Mid if you care more about overall equipment; choose 11 AWD if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Haval | H9 Mid

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Traverse 2018 3.6L LS (FWD)

Haval | H9 Mid

VS

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi Pajero 2020 3.5L GLX 5 Door Base

Haval | H9 Mid

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Creta 2024 1.5L Ultimate

Haval | H9 Mid

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Vitara 2018 1.6L GLX AWD (w/ sunroof)

Haval | H9 Mid

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Vitara 2018 GLX+ AWD

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, H9 Mid has a fuel consumption of No data, while 11 AWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, H9 Mid has a wheelbase of 2800 mm, while 11 AWD has a wheelbase of 2975 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 11 AWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. H9 Mid uses All Wheel Drive, while 11 AWD uses All Wheel Drive.