H9 High vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
161 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
4950 mm
4341 mm
1930 mm
1804 mm
1960 mm
1693 mm
2800 mm
2676 mm
750 L
414 L
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
90 L
50 L
9.1 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
6
/
Front and Rear
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
14.6
/
10
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/55 R19
/
265/55 R19
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
214 - 248 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
AT & Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
214
115 BHP
380 Nm
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
H9 High
- 360 Degree Camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose H9 High if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, H9 High has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, H9 High has a wheelbase of 2800 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, H9 High, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. H9 High uses All Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.