Haval Jolion Basic vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
/
4341 mm
/
1804 mm
/
1693 mm
/
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Interior
3.5
/
Colored Combination instrument
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Dual SRS Airbags
/
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
DCT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
140 BHP - 181 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
Automatic & DCT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
147 BHP
115 BHP
/
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Haval Jolion Basic
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Haval Jolion Basic if you care more about power; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Haval Jolion Basic has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Haval Jolion Basic has a wheelbase of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Haval Jolion Basic uses Front Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.