Tank 300 Challenger vs Atto 8 Premium FWD Comparison

Car Information

/

8.6

/

58

/

19

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

5 Doors

/

4760

5040

1930

1996

1927

1760

2750

2950

400 L

/

224

165 mm

/

20

/

5.9 M

Fuel Economy

12.1

34.7

75 L

60

10 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

PU

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

10.25

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

Front Driver's & Passenger's Airbag/ Farside Airbag/Front & Rear Side Airbags/Integrated Side Air Curtain

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

15.6

/

/

Android LCD

/

9

10

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

/

40

Transmission

Automatic

AT

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

Front Drive

/

Double Wishbone Type

/

Five-link

Wheels/brakes

265/65 R17

255/50 R20

265/65 R17

255/50 R20

Key Spec

2.0 L

1.5

223 BHP - 342 BHP

275 - 480

Automatic

AT

Gasoline & Hybrid

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 - 7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

1.5

Gasoline

Hybrid

Single Turbo

/

4

/

224 BHP

275

387 Nm

/

Technologies

/

Sport / Normal / Eco

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Tank 300 Challenger

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Atto 8 Premium FWD

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickTank 300 Challenger

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Tank 300 Challenger if you care more about price; choose Atto 8 Premium FWD if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Tank | Tank 300 Challenger

VS

Haval | H7 Top 2026

Tank | Tank 300 Challenger

VS

Honda | CRV EX Full Option (AWD)

Tank | Tank 300 Challenger

VS

Honda | ZRV LX 1.5L

Tank | Tank 300 Challenger

VS

BYD | Song Plus Design

Tank | Tank 300 Challenger

VS

Chery | Tiggo 9 Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Tank 300 Challenger has a fuel consumption of 8.26, while Atto 8 Premium FWD has a fuel consumption of 2.88. Therefore, Atto 8 Premium FWD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Tank 300 Challenger has a wheelbase of 2750, while Atto 8 Premium FWD has a wheelbase of 2950. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Atto 8 Premium FWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tank 300 Challenger uses Four Wheel Drive, while Atto 8 Premium FWD uses Front Drive.