Tank 300 Challenger vs L9 Ultra Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
4
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
6
5 Doors
5
4760
5218
1930
1998
1927
1800
2750
3105
400 L
/
224
176
/
Flush Door
/
21
/
6.15
Fuel Economy
12.1
13.5
75 L
65
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Smart Key
✓
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Nappa Leather
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
Front & Back Row Seats
/
4.82
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
OLED
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
15.7
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
✓
✓
/
9
19
/
15.7
/
15.7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
AT
/
1
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
Double wishbone front suspension
/
Five-link rear suspension
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
265/45 R21
265/65 R17
265/45 R21
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.5 L
224 BHP
449 BHP
Automatic
AT
Gasoline
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
6
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
449 BHP
387 Nm
620
/
330
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
Comfort, Normal, Sport, Performance
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
L2
Motor
/
620
/
2
/
PMSM
/
330
/
449
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tank 300 Challenger
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
L9 Ultra
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Cool Box
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Rollover stability control
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Security System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Active Safety Warning System
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tank 300 Challenger if you care more about price; choose L9 Ultra if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tank 300 Challenger has a fuel consumption of 8.26, while L9 Ultra has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, L9 Ultra is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tank 300 Challenger has a wheelbase of 2750, while L9 Ultra has a wheelbase of 3105. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, L9 Ultra, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tank 300 Challenger uses Four Wheel Drive, while L9 Ultra uses Four-Wheel Drive.