Tank 300 Conqueror vs Explorer 2025 Active 200A Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
180
4
4
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
5 Doors
/
4760
5049
1930
2004
1927
1775
2750
3025
400 L
515
224
/
/
18
Fuel Economy
12.1
12.7
75 L
67
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
13.2
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
9
6
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
10 Speed Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Electric 4WD
/
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
255/65 R18
265/65 R17
255/65 R18
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.3 L - 3.5 L
223 BHP - 342 BHP
290 BHP - 400 BHP
Automatic
10 Speed Automatic & 10 Speed Selectshift Automatic & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.3
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
300 BHP
387 Nm
420
/
2.3L EcoBoost L4
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tank 300 Conqueror
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Explorer 2025 Active 200A
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Rollover stability control
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious, comfortable, family-friendly interior
- Powerful engine options including V6 engine
- Advanced and easy-to-use technical and security systems
Negative
- High fuel consumption in some models
- The quality of interior materials need to improve
- Limited comfort of the third grade for adults
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tank 300 Conqueror if you care more about price; choose Explorer 2025 Active 200A if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tank 300 Conqueror has a fuel consumption of 8.26, while Explorer 2025 Active 200A has a fuel consumption of 7.87. Therefore, Explorer 2025 Active 200A is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tank 300 Conqueror has a wheelbase of 2750, while Explorer 2025 Active 200A has a wheelbase of 3025. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Explorer 2025 Active 200A, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tank 300 Conqueror uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Explorer 2025 Active 200A uses Four-Wheel Drive.