Tank 300 Conqueror vs Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
170 km/h
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760
4695 mm
1930
1800 mm
1927
1710 mm
2750
2670 mm
400 L
463 L
224
/
Fuel Economy
12.1
62.5 Km/L
75 L
43 L
10 Km/L
62.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Electric 4WD
/
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.4 L
217 BHP - 224 BHP
236 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
236 BHP
387 Nm
300 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tank 300 Conqueror
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tank 300 Conqueror if you care more about interior space; choose Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tank 300 Conqueror has a fuel consumption of 8.26, while Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline has a fuel consumption of 1.6. Therefore, Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tank 300 Conqueror has a wheelbase of 2750, while Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tank 300 Conqueror, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tank 300 Conqueror uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline uses All Wheel Drive.