Tank 300 Conqueror HEV vs Song Plus Premium Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
180
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
5
4760 mm
4775
1930 mm
1890
1927 mm
1680
2750 mm
2765
400 L
574
224 m
/
/
Flush Door
/
1975
/
19
Fuel Economy
15 Km/L
12.8
75 L
/
15 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
Sensatec Leather
Digital
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
LCD
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag, Integrated side air curtains
/
Front and Rear
/
4x Front Sensor, 4x Rear Sensor
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
All Seats
Infotainment
12.3
15.6-inch rotating screen
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
9
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infinity
Battery/Charging
/
6.6
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
MacPherson
/
Multi- link(5 links)
Wheels/brakes
/
VENTILATED DISC
/
DISC
/
235/50 R19
/
235/50 R19
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
217 BHP - 342 BHP
197 BHP - 360 BHP
8-Speed Automatic & Automatic
AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
1.5T
Hybrid
Hybrid
Single Turbo
/
4
/
342 BHP
319 BHP
648 Nm
790
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
Sport, Ordinary, Economical, Sand and Mud Terrain Mode
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
596
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tank 300 Conqueror HEV
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Song Plus Premium
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Steering Adjustment
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tank 300 Conqueror HEV if you care more about fuel economy; choose Song Plus Premium if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tank 300 Conqueror HEV has a fuel consumption of 6.67, while Song Plus Premium has a fuel consumption of 7.8. Therefore, Tank 300 Conqueror HEV is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tank 300 Conqueror HEV has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while Song Plus Premium has a wheelbase of 2765. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Song Plus Premium, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tank 300 Conqueror HEV uses Four Wheel Drive, while Song Plus Premium uses Four-Wheel Drive.