Haval V7 Medium vs Cherokee 3.2L Longitude Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
185 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4800
4624 mm
1950
1860 mm
1843
1681 mm
/
5 Doors
/
2718 mm
/
841 L
Fuel Economy
12.3
9.9 Km/L
/
60 L
/
9.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3"
/
Front Row Seats
/
Premium-textured VIP seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✔
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6-inch color multi-touch screen
/
8 speaker : 4 tweeters + 4 woofers
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0T
2.4 L - 3.2 L
227
184 BHP - 272 BHP
AT
Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0T
3.2 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
227
271 BHP
/
324 Nm
Motor
170
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
9 Modes
/
✓
/
/
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Haval V7 Medium
- 360 Degree Camera
- Cool Box
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Child Safety Monitoring System
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
Cherokee 3.2L Longitude
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCherokee 3.2L Longitude
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Haval V7 Medium if you care more about fuel economy; choose Cherokee 3.2L Longitude if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Haval V7 Medium has a fuel consumption of 8.13, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1. Therefore, Haval V7 Medium is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Haval V7 Medium has a wheelbase of No data, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Haval V7 Medium uses No data, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive.