CarteaCompare CarsHiace Bus Gasoline MT vs 300 Challenger 2.0T

Hiace Bus Gasoline MT vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

6

4

/

200 km/h

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

13

5 Seater

16

/

5915

4760 mm

1950

1930 mm

2280

1927 mm

3860

2750 mm

3640

/

6.4m

/

/

5 Doors

/

400 L

/

224 m

Fuel Economy

70

75 L

/

10 Km/L

/

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Interior

4.2

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

Driver & Front Passenger

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

12.3

/

/

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

9

Transmission

6-Speed Manual Transmission

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Macpherson Strut

/

Leaf spring rigid

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

235/65R16C

/

235/65R16C

/

Key Spec

-

2.0 L

161 - 277

223 BHP - 342 BHP

6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual Transmission

Automatic

Diesel & Gasoline

Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

13

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

277

224 BHP

351

387 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Hiace Bus Gasoline MT

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Limiter
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • Emergency Glass Roof Exit
    • Remote Central Door Locking
  • 300 Challenger 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick300 Challenger 2.0T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Hiace Bus Gasoline MT if you care more about interior space; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Hiace Bus Gasoline MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Coaster 2017 2.7L (19-Seater)

Toyota | Hiace Bus Gasoline MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Coaster 2017 2.7L (23-Seater)

Toyota | Hiace Bus Gasoline MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Coaster 2017 4.2L (19-Seater)

Toyota | Hiace Bus Gasoline MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Coaster 2017 4.2L (22-Seater)

Toyota | Hiace Bus Gasoline MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Coaster 2017 4.2L (23-Seater)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Hiace Bus Gasoline MT has a fuel consumption of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Hiace Bus Gasoline MT has a wheelbase of 3860, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hiace Bus Gasoline MT, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Hiace Bus Gasoline MT uses Rear Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.