Hiace Bus Gasoline MT vs MHERO II Comparison

Car Information

/

5.2

/

Hybrid

/

199000

/

MHERO

/

MHERO II

/

1.5

/

1300

/

31.7

Engine / Motor

6

/

Dimensions

13

5

16

/

5915

5100

1950

1998

2280

1899

3860

2909

3640

/

6.4m

/

/

3005

/

5

Fuel Economy

70

/

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

4.2

10.25

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front & Back Row Seats

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver & Front Passenger

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

/

/

/

15 min (20%-80%)

Transmission

6-Speed Manual Transmission

AT

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

Macpherson Strut

/

Leaf spring rigid

/

/

intelligent all-wheel drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

235/65R16C

/

235/65R16C

/

Key Spec

-

1.5

161 - 277

677

6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual Transmission

AT

Diesel & Gasoline

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

13

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5

1.5

Gasoline

Hybrid

277

677

351

848

Technologies

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Hiace Bus Gasoline MT

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Limiter
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • Emergency Glass Roof Exit
    • Remote Central Door Locking
  • MHERO II

    • Electric Locks
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Heater
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHiace Bus Gasoline MT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Hiace Bus Gasoline MT if you care more about price; choose MHERO II if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Hiace Bus Gasoline MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Coaster 2017 2.7L (19-Seater)

Toyota | Hiace Bus Gasoline MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Coaster 2017 2.7L (23-Seater)

Toyota | Hiace Bus Gasoline MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Coaster 2017 4.2L (19-Seater)

Toyota | Hiace Bus Gasoline MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Coaster 2017 4.2L (22-Seater)

Toyota | Hiace Bus Gasoline MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Coaster 2017 4.2L (23-Seater)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Hiace Bus Gasoline MT has a fuel consumption of No data, while MHERO II has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Hiace Bus Gasoline MT has a wheelbase of 3860, while MHERO II has a wheelbase of 2909. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hiace Bus Gasoline MT, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Hiace Bus Gasoline MT uses Rear Drive, while MHERO II uses Four-Wheel Drive.