Hiace Bus Gasoline MT vs Shark 6 Premium Comparison

Car Information

/

135

/

650

/

12.8

/

520

Engine / Motor

6

4

/

160 km/h

/

1500 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

13

5 Seater

16

/

5915

5457 mm

1950

1971 mm

2280

1925 mm

3860

3260 mm

3640

/

6.4m

/

/

4 Doors

/

1200 L

/

230 mm

Fuel Economy

70

59 L

/

12.8

/

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

4.2

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

Driver & Front Passenger

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

Transmission

6-Speed Manual Transmission

AT

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

All Wheel Drive

Macpherson Strut

Double-Wishbone

Leaf spring rigid

Double Wishbone

/

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

235/65R16C

/

235/65R16C

/

Key Spec

-

1.5T

161 - 277

430 BHP

6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual Transmission

AT

Diesel & Gasoline

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

13

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

Engine

3.5

1.5T

Gasoline

Hybrid

277

430 BHP

351

650 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Hiace Bus Gasoline MT

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Limiter
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • Emergency Glass Roof Exit
    • Remote Central Door Locking
  • Shark 6 Premium

    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHiace Bus Gasoline MT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Hiace Bus Gasoline MT if you care more about price; choose Shark 6 Premium if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Hiace Bus Gasoline MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Coaster 2017 2.7L (19-Seater)

Toyota | Hiace Bus Gasoline MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Coaster 2017 2.7L (23-Seater)

Toyota | Hiace Bus Gasoline MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Coaster 2017 4.2L (19-Seater)

Toyota | Hiace Bus Gasoline MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Coaster 2017 4.2L (22-Seater)

Toyota | Hiace Bus Gasoline MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Coaster 2017 4.2L (23-Seater)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Hiace Bus Gasoline MT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Shark 6 Premium has a fuel consumption of 12.8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Hiace Bus Gasoline MT has a wheelbase of 3860, while Shark 6 Premium has a wheelbase of 3260 mm . Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hiace Bus Gasoline MT, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Hiace Bus Gasoline MT uses Rear Drive, while Shark 6 Premium uses All Wheel Drive .