Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT vs 3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1 Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

4

4

Dimensions

3

3

2360

2021kg

16

16

5915

6193

1950

/

2280

2283

3860

3682

3500

4.5T

6.4m

/

3180 - 1760 - 1605

/

9.3m³

/

1140

/

/

166

Fuel Economy

12.6 Km/L

/

70

100

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

4.2

/

/

Driver Seat

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

Safety

Driver & Front Passenger

Side Driver Airbag.Driver & Passenger Airbags.

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

7

/

2

/

/

Transmission

6-Speed Automatic Transmission

6-Speed Manual Transmission

/

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Rear Drive

Macpherson Strut

/

Leaf spring rigid

/

Wheels/brakes

/

Drum

/

215/70R16C

/

215/70R16C

/

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.5 L

2.3 L - 2.3 L

88 BHP - 277

125 - 125

6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Manual

6-Speed Manual Transmission & Manual

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel

TBD

TBD

3 - 13 Seater

3 - 3

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.8

2.3

Diesel

Diesel

174

125

450

/

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • Remote Central Door Locking
  • 3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1

    • Keyless Entry
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Limiter
    • Spare Wheel
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT if you care more about interior space; choose 3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1 if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot Traveller 2022 L3 Business

Toyota | Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT

VS

Peugeot | Traveller

Toyota | Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT

VS

Toyota | Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT

Toyota | Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT

VS

Toyota | Hiace Van STD DSL AT

Toyota | Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT

VS

Renault | 3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT has a fuel consumption of 7.94, while 3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT has a wheelbase of 3860, while 3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1 has a wheelbase of 3682. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT uses Rear Drive, while 3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1 uses Rear Drive.