CarteaCompare CarsHiace Van High Roof DSL AT vs Ford Transit 2020 3.7L 150XL (Medium Roof)

Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT vs Ford Transit 2020 3.7L 150XL (Medium Roof) Comparison

Car Information

/

8.5

/

Engine / Motor

4

6

/

158

Dimensions

3

2 Seater

2360

/

16

/

5915

5.585

1950

2.065

2280

2.123

3860

3.302

3500

/

6.4m

/

3180 - 1760 - 1605

/

9.3m³

/

1140

/

/

6986

Fuel Economy

12.6 Km/L

7.0

70

95

Comfort

/

/

/

Interior

4.2

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver & Front Passenger

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

/

/

/

2

/

Transmission

6-Speed Automatic Transmission

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Macpherson Strut

/

Leaf spring rigid

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Drum

/

215/70R16C

/

215/70R16C

/

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.5 L

2.2 L - 3.7 L

88 BHP - 277

125 BHP - 299

6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual

& 10AT & 8AT & Automatic & Manual

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

3 - 13 Seater

2 - 13

Exterior

/

/

Engine

2.8

3.7 L

Diesel

Petrol

174

275 BHP

450

340

Technologies

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • Remote Central Door Locking
  • Ford Transit 2020 3.7L 150XL (Medium Roof)

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Spare Wheel
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHiace Van High Roof DSL AT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT if you care more about price; choose Ford Transit 2020 3.7L 150XL (Medium Roof) if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT

VS

Ford | Ford Transit 2021 3.7L 150XL (Medium Roof)

Toyota | Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT

VS

Ford | Ford Transit 2022 3.7L 150XL (Medium Roof)

Toyota | Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT

VS

Ford | Ford Transit 2020 3.7L 150XL (Medium Roof)

Toyota | Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot Partner 2023 e-Partner (Long)

Toyota | Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT

VS

Ford | Ford Transit 2019 3.7L 150XL (Medium Roof)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT has a fuel consumption of 7.94, while Ford Transit 2020 3.7L 150XL (Medium Roof) has a fuel consumption of 14.29. Therefore, Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT has a wheelbase of 3860, while Ford Transit 2020 3.7L 150XL (Medium Roof) has a wheelbase of 3.302. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT uses Rear Drive, while Ford Transit 2020 3.7L 150XL (Medium Roof) uses Rear Wheel Drive.