CarteaCompare CarsHiace Van High Roof DSL MT vs Toyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GLX High Roof LWB (A/T)

Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT vs Toyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GLX High Roof LWB (A/T) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

4

4

/

155

Dimensions

3

13 Seater

2355

/

16

/

5915

5380

1950

1880

2280

2285

3860

3110

3500

/

6.4m

/

3180 - 1760 - 1605

/

9.3m³

/

1145

/

/

9800

Fuel Economy

13.0 Km/L

7.4

70

70

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

4.2

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver & Front Passenger

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

/

/

2

/

/

/

/

Transmission

6-Speed Manual Transmission

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Macpherson Strut

/

Leaf spring rigid

/

Wheels/brakes

/

Drum

/

215/70R16C

/

215/70R16C

/

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.5 L

2.5 L - 3.5 L

88 BHP - 277

88 BHP - 277

6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual

6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

3 - 13 Seater

3 - 13 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.8

2.7 L

Diesel

Gasoline

174

149 BHP

420

240

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • Remote Central Door Locking
  • Toyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GLX High Roof LWB (A/T)

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHiace Van High Roof DSL MT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT if you care more about price; choose Toyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GLX High Roof LWB (A/T) if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot Traveller 2021 L3 VIP

Toyota | Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT

VS

Ford | Ford Transit 2022 3.7L 150XL (Low Roof)

Toyota | Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GLX High Roof LWB (A/T)

Toyota | Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2021 3.5L high roof commuter (13 seater)

Toyota | Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT

VS

Ford | Ford Transit 2018 3.7L 150XL (Low Roof)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT has a fuel consumption of 7.69, while Toyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GLX High Roof LWB (A/T) has a fuel consumption of 13.51. Therefore, Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT has a wheelbase of 3860, while Toyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GLX High Roof LWB (A/T) has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT uses Rear Drive, while Toyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GLX High Roof LWB (A/T) uses Rear Wheel Drive.