Hiace Van STD DSL MT vs Hiace Van STD DSL MT Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

4

/

Dimensions

3

/

2210

/

16

/

5265

/

1950

/

1990

/

3210

/

3300

/

5.5m

/

2530 - 1760 - 1340

/

6.2m³

/

1090

/

Fuel Economy

13.0 Km/L

/

70

/

Comfort

/

/

Interior

4.2

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver & Front Passenger

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

/

/

/

2

/

Transmission

6-Speed Manual Transmission

/

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

/

Macpherson Strut

/

Leaf spring rigid

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Drum

/

215/70R16C

/

215/70R16C

/

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.5 L

/

88 BHP - 277

/

6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual

/

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

/

TBD

/

3 - 13 Seater

/

Exterior

/

/

/

Engine

2.8

/

Diesel

/

174

/

420

/

Technologies

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Hiace Van STD DSL MT

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • Remote Central Door Locking
  • Hiace Van STD DSL MT

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • Remote Central Door Locking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHiace Van STD DSL MT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Hiace Van STD DSL MT if you care more about overall equipment; choose Hiace Van STD DSL MT if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Hiace Van STD DSL MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2019 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater)

Toyota | Hiace Van STD DSL MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2020 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater)

Toyota | Hiace Van STD DSL MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GL High Roof LWB

Toyota | Hiace Van STD DSL MT

VS

Nissan | Microbus H/R EX 2.5 AT 13S 4-Door

Toyota | Hiace Van STD DSL MT

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot Traveller 2019 L3 VIP

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Hiace Van STD DSL MT has a fuel consumption of 7.69, while Hiace Van STD DSL MT has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Hiace Van STD DSL MT has a wheelbase of 3210, while Hiace Van STD DSL MT has a wheelbase of 3210. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Hiace Van STD DSL MT uses Rear Drive, while Hiace Van STD DSL MT uses Rear Drive.