CarteaCompare CarsHiace Van STD GAS MT vs Hiace 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater)

Hiace Van STD GAS MT vs Hiace 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

6

65 L

/

160 km/h

Dimensions

3

3 Seater

2155

/

16

/

5265

5915 mm

1950

1950 mm

1990

2280 mm

3210

3860 mm

3200

/

5.5m

/

2530 - 1760 - 1340

/

6.2m³

/

1045

/

/

options.9,800 L

/

800 L

Fuel Economy

9.1 Km/L

7.4 Km/L

70

65 L

/

7.4 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

Interior

4.2

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver & Front Passenger

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

/

/

/

2

/

Transmission

6-Speed Manual Transmission

Manual

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Macpherson Strut

/

Leaf spring rigid

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Drum

/

215/70R16C

/

215/70R16C

/

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.5 L

2.5 L - 3.5 L

88 BHP - 277

88 BHP - 277

6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual

6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

3 - 13 Seater

3 - 13 Seater

Exterior

/

/

Engine

3.5

3.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

277

277 BHP

351

360 Nm

Technologies

/

Motor

/

360 Nm

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Hiace Van STD GAS MT

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • Remote Central Door Locking
  • Hiace 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater)

    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHiace 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Hiace Van STD GAS MT if you care more about fuel economy; choose Hiace 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater) if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Hiace Van STD GAS MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2024 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater)

Toyota | Hiace Van STD GAS MT

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot Boxer 2022 2.2L Diesel (L4H3)

Toyota | Hiace Van STD GAS MT

VS

Toyota | Hiace Van STD GAS MT

Toyota | Hiace Van STD GAS MT

VS

Nissan | Nissan Urvan 2023 MICROBUS 4 DOORS, 13 SEATER M/T, HIGH ROOF

Toyota | Hiace Van STD GAS MT

VS

Nissan | Urvan MICROBUS 4 DOORS, 13 SEATER M/T, HIGH ROOF

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Hiace Van STD GAS MT has a fuel consumption of 10.99, while Hiace 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater) has a fuel consumption of 13.51. Therefore, Hiace Van STD GAS MT is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Hiace Van STD GAS MT has a wheelbase of 3210, while Hiace 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater) has a wheelbase of 3860 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hiace 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Hiace Van STD GAS MT uses Rear Drive, while Hiace 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater) uses Rear Wheel Drive.