Hino 300 vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
3
5 Seater
4,765
4341 mm
1,880
1804 mm
2,200
1693 mm
3,430
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
6.6 km/L
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
6-speed Manual transmission
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
147
105 BHP - 135 BHP
6-speed Manual transmission
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Diesel
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
3
5 - 5
Engine
4.0 L
1.6 L
Diesel
Gasoline
147
115 BHP
420
156 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Hino 300
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHino 300
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Hino 300 if you care more about price; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Hino 300 has a fuel consumption of 15.15, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Hino 300 has a wheelbase of 3,430, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hino 300, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Hino 300 uses No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.