Pilot 4WD Sport 2025 vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST Comparison

Car Information

/

8.0

/

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

185

6

3

3490 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

8 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

/

/

4.314

/

1.809

/

1.624

/

2.585

589 L

448

Fuel Economy

11.5

17.2

80 L

48

8 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

9

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

CVT

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

/

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

3.5 L - 3.5 L

1.3 L - 1.5 L

253 BHP - 285

112 BHP - 168

Automatic

6AT & Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 Seater - 8

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.5 L

1.3 L

Gasoline

Petrol

None

/

4

/

285 BHP

160 BHP

355 Nm

230

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pilot 4WD Sport 2025

    • Push Button Start
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Remote key types
  • MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious and comfortable interior
  • Strong performance and acceptable fuel economy
  • Advanced and reliable security features

Negative

  • The price is higher than some competitors
  • The infotainment system may be complicated
  • Limited engine options

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Related comparisons

Editor's PickPilot 4WD Sport 2025

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Pilot 4WD Sport 2025 if you care more about price; choose MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Honda | Pilot 4WD Sport 2025

VS

MG | MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

Honda | Pilot 4WD Sport 2025

VS

Renault | Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

Honda | Pilot 4WD Sport 2025

VS

Renault | All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT

Honda | Pilot 4WD Sport 2025

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2)

Honda | Pilot 4WD Sport 2025

VS

BAIC | BAIC X35 2023 1.5L Elite

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Pilot 4WD Sport 2025 has a fuel consumption of 8.7, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Pilot 4WD Sport 2025 has a wheelbase of No data, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pilot 4WD Sport 2025 uses All Wheel Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST uses Front Wheel Drive.