HONGQI EHS3 2024 Hongqi E-HS3 2024 EV 153 hp (FWD) vs MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD Comparison
Car Information
10.0
10.9
/
✓
Engine / Motor
160
170
N/A, Electric
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
✓
✓
4.490
4.314
1.874
1.809
1.613
1.624
2.750
2.585
370
448
Fuel Economy
N/A
48
/
17.2
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
407
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
153 BHP - 305 BHP
112 BHP - 168
TBD
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
1.3 L - 1.5 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
0.0 L
1.5 L
Electric
Petrol
153 BHP
112 BHP
340
150
Motor
Single
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
HONGQI EHS3 2024 Hongqi E-HS3 2024 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMG ZS 2020 1.5L STD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose HONGQI EHS3 2024 Hongqi E-HS3 2024 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about interior space; choose MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, HONGQI EHS3 2024 Hongqi E-HS3 2024 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, HONGQI EHS3 2024 Hongqi E-HS3 2024 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.750, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HONGQI EHS3 2024 Hongqi E-HS3 2024 EV 153 hp (FWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. HONGQI EHS3 2024 Hongqi E-HS3 2024 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD uses Front Wheel Drive.