HR-V SPORT vs EREV RWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
1498cc
/
Dimensions
5
5
1287
/
17 英寸
/
4398
4,825
1790
1,980
1590
1,620
2610
2,940
196
/
Fuel Economy
40
/
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
/
Automatic
Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.8 L - 1.8 L
/
119 - 140 BHP
/
Automatic & CVT
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
/
Exterior
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
Naturally Aspirated
/
1.5L i-VTEC
/
4
/
10.6:1
/
DOHC IN VTC+IN-VTEC
/
119
310
87.7
1,152
6600
/
145
367
4300
/
i-VTEC
/
PGM-FI 电喷
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
HR-V SPORT
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Front and Rear Crumple Zone
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Blind Spot Warning
- Seatbelt pretensioner
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
EREV RWD
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose HR-V SPORT if you care more about overall equipment; choose EREV RWD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, HR-V SPORT has a fuel consumption of 5.35, while EREV RWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, HR-V SPORT has a wheelbase of 2610, while EREV RWD has a wheelbase of 2,940. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EREV RWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. HR-V SPORT uses Front Drive, while EREV RWD uses No data.