HR-V SPORT vs Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo 4x2 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
1498cc
/
/
190 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1287
/
17 英寸
/
4398
4828 mm
1790
1943 mm
1590
1792 mm
2610
2916 mm
196
/
/
5 Doors
/
782 L
Fuel Economy
40
93 L
/
10 Km/L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.8 L
3.6 L - 6.4 L
119 - 140 BHP
286 BHP - 707 BHP
Automatic & CVT
8AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 7
Exterior
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
/
1.5L i-VTEC
/
4
/
10.6:1
/
DOHC IN VTC+IN-VTEC
/
119
290 BHP
87.7
/
6600
/
145
350 Nm
4300
/
i-VTEC
/
PGM-FI 电喷
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
HR-V SPORT
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Front and Rear Crumple Zone
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Blind Spot Warning
- Seatbelt pretensioner
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo 4x2
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Flexible interior design and practical space
- Fuel efficiency and economical maintenance
- Driving comfort and good wheelbase adjustment
Negative
- Insufficient engine performance in some cases
- The quality of interior materials needs to be improved
- Standard equipment is limited in basic categories
Positive
- Versatility of options for powerful engines
- Impressive off-road driving capabilities
- High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies
Negative
- High fuel consumption for some models
- High price compared to some competitors
- Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose HR-V SPORT if you care more about price; choose Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo 4x2 if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, HR-V SPORT has a fuel consumption of 5.35, while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo 4x2 has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, HR-V SPORT is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, HR-V SPORT has a wheelbase of 2610, while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo 4x2 has a wheelbase of 2916 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo 4x2, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. HR-V SPORT uses Front Drive, while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo 4x2 uses All Wheel Drive.