CarteaCompare CarsHS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD vs C5 TECH 1.5L

HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD vs C5 TECH 1.5L Comparison

Car Information

6.9

/

Engine / Motor

210

180 km/h

4

4

/

1496 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4630

4400 mm

1890

1830 mm

1663

1590 mm

2750

2630 mm

507

/

/

5

Fuel Economy

13.5

7.1

65

51 L

/

6.9 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

10.25

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

Transmission

9AT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

1.5 L - 1.5 L

127 - 231

156 - 197

9AT & Automatic & DCT

7 Speed DCT & 7DCT & CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

Engine

2.0

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

231

194 BHP

370

290

/

In-Line

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Temperature Display
    • Welcome Light
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active braking
  • C5 TECH 1.5L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickC5 TECH 1.5L

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose C5 TECH 1.5L if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Exeed | LX Luxury

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Peugeot | 2008 1.2T GT (155HP)

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Nissan | XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Jeep | Renegade Limited

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Jeep | Renegade Trailhawk

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while C5 TECH 1.5L has a fuel consumption of 14.08. Therefore, HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD has a wheelbase of 2750, while C5 TECH 1.5L has a wheelbase of 2630 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while C5 TECH 1.5L uses Front Wheel Drive.