HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison

Car Information

6.9

6.5

/

160+160

/

≥400

Engine / Motor

210

/

4

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4630

5209

1890

2010

1663

1731

2750

3110

507

/

Fuel Economy

13.5

/

65

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

Transmission

9AT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

/

127 - 231

429 BHP - 543 BHP

9AT & Automatic & DCT

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 Seater

4 Seater - 7 Seater

/

TBD

/

320 km - 515 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0

0.0 L

Gasoline

Electric

231

429 BHP

370

600

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Temperature Display
    • Welcome Light
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active braking
  • EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Exeed | LX Luxury

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Peugeot | 2008 1.2T GT (155HP)

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Nissan | XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Jeep | Renegade Limited

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Jeep | Renegade Trailhawk

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD has a wheelbase of 2750, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.