HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD vs Roewe D5X Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
200
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4630
4,700
1890
1,890
1663
1,664
2750
2,765
507
/
/
18"
Fuel Economy
13.5
21.6 km/L.
65
50
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
Passenger Seat
/
fabric
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
24.6"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
9AT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
MacPherson Independent
/
Rear Multi-link Independent
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.5T
127 - 231
141 + 181
9AT & Automatic & DCT
AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0
1.5T
Gasoline
Hybrid
231
141 + 181
370
230 + 340
/
✓
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comfort / Standard / Sport
Motor
/
340
/
Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery
/
181
Comparison of configuration highlights
HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active braking
Roewe D5X Comfort
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD if you care more about price; choose Roewe D5X Comfort if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Roewe D5X Comfort has a fuel consumption of 4.63. Therefore, Roewe D5X Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD has a wheelbase of 2750, while Roewe D5X Comfort has a wheelbase of 2,765. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Roewe D5X Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Roewe D5X Comfort uses Front Drive.