HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship vs RX Comfort 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
185 km/h
4
4
1990 cc
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4655 mm
4781 mm
1900 mm
1920 mm
1668 mm
1671 mm
2770 mm
2815 mm
/
500 L
/
187 m
Fuel Economy
17
16 Km/L
/
50 L
/
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Sports
Standard
/
Dual Zone
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.6
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
10
8
Transmission
8-Speed Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
166 BHP - 248 BHP
245 HP - 261 BHP
7DCT & 8-Speed Automatic
7DCT & 8AT & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0T
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Direct Injection+Turbo Charging
/
Single Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
248 BHP
261 BHP
380 Nm
400 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
RX Comfort 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship if you care more about price; choose RX Comfort 2.0T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship has a fuel consumption of 5.88, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship has a wheelbase of 2770 mm, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2815 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RX Comfort 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship uses Four Wheel Drive, while RX Comfort 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.