HS7 2.0T Deluxe 4WD vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
4,995
4341 mm
1,960
1804 mm
1,760
1693 mm
2,920
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
9.2 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
8-speed Automatic (8AT)
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
252 - 337
105 BHP - 135 BHP
8-speed Automatic (8AT) & 8AT & Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7
5 - 5
Engine
3.0L V6 supercharged
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
337
115 BHP
445
156 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
HS7 2.0T Deluxe 4WD
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose HS7 2.0T Deluxe 4WD if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, HS7 2.0T Deluxe 4WD has a fuel consumption of 10.87, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, HS7 2.0T Deluxe 4WD has a wheelbase of 2,920, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS7 2.0T Deluxe 4WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. HS7 2.0T Deluxe 4WD uses No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.