Huge E2 vs XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
/
5 Doors
/
4680 mm
/
1840 mm
/
1725 mm
/
2706 mm
/
550 L
Fuel Economy
14.3
15.6 Km/L
/
60 L
/
15.6 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5
2.5 L
201 BHP - 202
132 BHP - 188 BHP
7DCT & AT
Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater - 7 Seater
Engine
1.5
2.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
201 BHP
188 BHP
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
/
244 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Huge E2
XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Related comparisons
Editor's PickXTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Huge E2 if you care more about power; choose XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Huge E2 has a fuel consumption of 6.99, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) has a fuel consumption of 6.41. Therefore, XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Huge E2 has a wheelbase of No data, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) has a wheelbase of 2706 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Huge E2 uses No data, while XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater) uses Front Wheel Drive.