Huracan EVO Coupe RWD vs RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
325 km/h
260 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
2 Seater
4 Seater
4520 mm
4700 mm
1933 mm
1840 mm
1165 mm
1395 mm
2620 mm
2730 mm
/
2 Doors
/
300 L
/
135 m
Fuel Economy
8.3 Km/L
7 Km/L
83 L
66 L
8.3 Km/L
7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
5.2 L
3.5 L - 5.0 L
470 BHP - 640 BHP
241 - 471 BHP
Automatic
8-speed automatic & 8-Speed Sport Direct Shift Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
2 Seater
4 Seater - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
5.2 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
600 BHP
312 BHP
560 Nm
377 Nm
/
V
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Huracan EVO Coupe RWD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Huracan EVO Coupe RWD if you care more about fuel economy; choose RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Huracan EVO Coupe RWD has a fuel consumption of 12.05, while RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L has a fuel consumption of 14.29. Therefore, Huracan EVO Coupe RWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Huracan EVO Coupe RWD has a wheelbase of 2620 mm, while RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L has a wheelbase of 2730 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Huracan EVO Coupe RWD uses Rear Wheel Drive, while RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L uses All Wheel Drive.