i3 120 Ah vs A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
233 km/h
Dimensions
4 Seater
5 Seater
4011 mm
4939 mm
1775 mm
1886 mm
1598 mm
1457 mm
2570 mm
2924 mm
260 L
530 L
Fuel Economy
/
16.7 Km/L
/
63 L
/
16.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
184 BHP
180 BHP - 560 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & Manual
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
4 Seater
5 Seater
/
1.8 L - 4.0 L
/
TBD
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
184 BHP
190 BHP
270 Nm
320 Nm
/
2.0 L
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
i3 120 Ah
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
A6 40 TFSI (190 HP)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickA6 40 TFSI (190 HP)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose i3 120 Ah if you care more about power; choose A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, i3 120 Ah has a fuel consumption of No data, while A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, i3 120 Ah has a wheelbase of 2570 mm, while A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) has a wheelbase of 2924 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, A6 40 TFSI (190 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. i3 120 Ah uses Rear Wheel Drive, while A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive.