i3 120 Ah vs ES 300h Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
/
/
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
4 Seater
5 Seater
4011 mm
4975 mm
1775 mm
1865 mm
1598 mm
1445 mm
2570 mm
2870 mm
260 L
/
/
4 Doors
/
/
Fuel Economy
/
15 Km/L
/
50 L
/
15 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
10
Transmission
/
E-CVT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Key Spec
TBD
/
184 BHP
204 BHP - 302 BHP
Automatic
CVT & Direct Shift, 8AT & E-CVT
Electric
Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
/
4 Seater
5 Seater - 5 Seater
/
2.5 L - 3.5 L
/
TBD
Engine
Electric
Hybrid
184 BHP
214 BHP
270 Nm
356 Nm
/
In-Line
/
2.5 L
/
None
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
i3 120 Ah
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
ES 300h
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Luxurious and refined interior design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Smooth and comfortable driving performance
Negative
- Narrow rear cargo space
- The infotainment system is relatively old
- A higher price than competitors in the same category
Related comparisons
Editor's PickES 300h
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose i3 120 Ah if you care more about overall equipment; choose ES 300h if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, i3 120 Ah has a fuel consumption of No data, while ES 300h has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, i3 120 Ah has a wheelbase of 2570 mm, while ES 300h has a wheelbase of 2870 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ES 300h, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. i3 120 Ah uses Rear Wheel Drive, while ES 300h uses Front Wheel Drive.