i3 120 Ah vs IS 300 Premier 2.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
260 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
4 Seater
5 Seater
4011 mm
4665 mm
1775 mm
1810 mm
1598 mm
1430 mm
2570 mm
2800 mm
260 L
480 L
/
4 Doors
/
140 m
Fuel Economy
/
13 Km/L
/
66 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
184 BHP
241 BHP - 312 BHP
Automatic
8 Speed Sport Direct Shift
Electric
Petrol & Gasoline
TBD
/
4 Seater
5 Seater - 5 Seater
/
2.0 L - 3.5 L
/
TBD
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
184 BHP
241 BHP
270 Nm
350 Nm
/
In-Line
/
2.0 L
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Comparison of configuration highlights
i3 120 Ah
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
IS 300 Premier 2.0L
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickIS 300 Premier 2.0L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose i3 120 Ah if you care more about overall equipment; choose IS 300 Premier 2.0L if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, i3 120 Ah has a fuel consumption of No data, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, i3 120 Ah has a wheelbase of 2570 mm, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2800 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, IS 300 Premier 2.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. i3 120 Ah uses Rear Wheel Drive, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L uses Rear Wheel Drive.