IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

3.5

/

710

/

103

/

Engine / Motor

252

/

/

4

/

GCC

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

2385

/

20"

/

4937

4950 mm

1988

1930 mm

1671

1730 mm

2980

2850 mm

617–1,833 L

/

/

5 Doors

Fuel Economy

/

20 Km/L

/

65 L

/

20 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

Interior

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

/

/

30–80% in around 17 min

/

Transmission

1-speed automatic / fixed-ratio EV gearbox

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

AWD

/

Double wishbone independent suspension

/

Multi-link independent suspension

/

Wheels/brakes

Ventilated discs

/

Ventilated discs

/

235/50 R20

/

235/50 R20

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Hybrid

671

240 BHP

800

237 Nm

/

In-Line

/

2.5 L

/

None

/

4

Motor

Ternary NMC

/

Technologies

3

/

12

/

1

/

/

/

/

Key Spec

/

2.5 L - 2.5 L

/

240 - 240

/

CVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)

/

Hybrid

/

TBD

/

7 - 7

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Child Safety Monitoring System
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

    • Rear Camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHighlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD if you care more about interior space; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD has a fuel consumption of No data, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD has a wheelbase of 2980, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.