Infiniti QX30 2024 2.0T Luxe Sensory (AWD) vs 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
230
200 km/h
4
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
✓
/
4.425
4760 mm
1.815
1930 mm
1.530
1927 mm
2.700
2750 mm
430
400 L
/
5 Doors
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
14.9
15 Km/L
56
75 L
/
15 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
12.3
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
9
✓
/
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.0 L
208 BHP
342 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Petrol
Hybrid
208 BHP
342 BHP
350
648 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Infiniti QX30 2024 2.0T Luxe Sensory (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
300 Challenger 2.0T HEV
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Infiniti QX30 2024 2.0T Luxe Sensory (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Infiniti QX30 2024 2.0T Luxe Sensory (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Infiniti QX30 2024 2.0T Luxe Sensory (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2.700, while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Infiniti QX30 2024 2.0T Luxe Sensory (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV uses Four Wheel Drive.