Ioniq 5N vs EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
/
4490 mm
/
1874 mm
/
1613 mm
/
2750 mm
Fuel Economy
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Electric
/
MacPherson independent suspension
/
Multi-link independent suspension
/
electric assist
/
Wheels/brakes
275/35 R21
/
275/35 R21
/
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
650 BHP
153 BHP - 305 BHP
DHT
TBD
Electric
Electric
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Electric
650 BHP
153 BHP
/
340 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
L2
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ioniq 5N
- 360 Degree Camera
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Active Safety Warning System
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ioniq 5N if you care more about power; choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ioniq 5N has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ioniq 5N has a wheelbase of No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ioniq 5N uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.