IS350 F Sport Prestige 3.5L vs E300 3.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
260 km/h
6
4
3490 cc
2998 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4665 mm
4949 mm
1810 mm
1880 mm
1430 mm
1480 mm
2800 mm
2961 mm
450 L
540 L
140 m
/
Fuel Economy
9 Km/L
9 Km/L
66 L
66 L
9 Km/L
9 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.5 L
2.0 L - 3.0 L
241 BHP - 312 BHP
204 BHP - 402
8 Speed Sport Direct Shift
7-speed Automatic (7G-TRONIC Plus) & 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Engine
V
In-Line
3.5 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
312 BHP
285 BHP
380 Nm
420 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
IS350 F Sport Prestige 3.5L
E300 3.0L
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickIS350 F Sport Prestige 3.5L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose IS350 F Sport Prestige 3.5L if you care more about price; choose E300 3.0L if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, IS350 F Sport Prestige 3.5L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while E300 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, IS350 F Sport Prestige 3.5L has a wheelbase of 2800 mm, while E300 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2961 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E300 3.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. IS350 F Sport Prestige 3.5L uses All Wheel Drive, while E300 3.0L uses All Wheel Drive.