Isuzu MU-X 2024 3.0T AWD LS vs C4 Feel Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
/
200 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4850
4360 mm
1870
2032 mm
1875
1525 mm
2855
2670 mm
235
380 L
Fuel Economy
80
50 L
/
17.9 Km/L
/
17.9 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3000 L
1199 L - 1600 L
190 BHP
120 BHP - 155 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Diesel
Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
1.2 L
Diesel
Gasoline
190 BHP
155 BHP
450
240 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Isuzu MU-X 2024 3.0T AWD LS
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
C4 Feel
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickC4 Feel
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Isuzu MU-X 2024 3.0T AWD LS if you care more about interior space; choose C4 Feel if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Isuzu MU-X 2024 3.0T AWD LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while C4 Feel has a fuel consumption of 5.59. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Isuzu MU-X 2024 3.0T AWD LS has a wheelbase of 2855, while C4 Feel has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Isuzu MU-X 2024 3.0T AWD LS, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Isuzu MU-X 2024 3.0T AWD LS uses All Wheel Drive, while C4 Feel uses Front Wheel Drive.