Isuzu MU-X 2024 3.0T AWD LS vs TXL Comfort 1.6T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
200 km/h
/
1598 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4850
4780 mm
1870
1885 mm
1875
1730 mm
2855
2800 mm
235
450 L
/
5 Doors
/
200 m
Fuel Economy
80
50 L
/
16 Km/L
/
16 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
136 BHP - 190 BHP
197 BHP - 290 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Diesel & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
1.6 L
Diesel
Gasoline
190 BHP
290 BHP
450
400 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Isuzu MU-X 2024 3.0T AWD LS
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
TXL Comfort 1.6T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Isuzu MU-X 2024 3.0T AWD LS if you care more about interior space; choose TXL Comfort 1.6T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Isuzu MU-X 2024 3.0T AWD LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while TXL Comfort 1.6T has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Isuzu MU-X 2024 3.0T AWD LS has a wheelbase of 2855, while TXL Comfort 1.6T has a wheelbase of 2800 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Isuzu MU-X 2024 3.0T AWD LS, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Isuzu MU-X 2024 3.0T AWD LS uses All Wheel Drive, while TXL Comfort 1.6T uses Front Wheel Drive.