Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS (z06) vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
4
4
/
200 km/h
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4.825
4760 mm
1.860
1930 mm
1.825
1927 mm
2.845
2750 mm
235
400 L
/
5 Doors
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
12.3
10 Km/L
65
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.0 L
2.0 L
136 BHP - 190 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Diesel & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
2.0 L
Diesel
Gasoline
163 BHP
224 BHP
430
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS (z06)
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS (z06) if you care more about fuel economy; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS (z06) has a fuel consumption of 8.13, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS (z06) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS (z06) has a wheelbase of 2.845, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS (z06) uses All Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.