Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS (z06) vs GS4 1.5T GB Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
4
/
/
180 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4.825
4545 mm
1.860
1856 mm
1.825
1668 mm
2.845
2680 mm
235
470 L
Fuel Economy
12.3
14.7 Km/L
65
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.0 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
136 BHP - 190 BHP
165 BHP - 248
Automatic & Manual
8AT
Diesel & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
1.5 L
Diesel
Gasoline
163 BHP
165 BHP
430
265 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS (z06)
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
GS4 1.5T GB
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS4 1.5T GB
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS (z06) if you care more about overall equipment; choose GS4 1.5T GB if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS (z06) has a fuel consumption of 8.13, while GS4 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, GS4 1.5T GB is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS (z06) has a wheelbase of 2.845, while GS4 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GS4 1.5T GB, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS (z06) uses All Wheel Drive, while GS4 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.