Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS (z06) vs V23 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
4.825
4220
1.860
1915
1.825
1845
2.845
2735
235
/
/
19
/
1613
/
1641
/
42
/
40
Fuel Economy
12.3
/
65
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
7
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
/
255/55 R19
/
255/55 R19
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.0 L
/
136 BHP - 190 BHP
134
Automatic & Manual
AT
Diesel & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
7 - 7
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
3.0 L
/
Diesel
Electric
163 BHP
134
430
/
Motor
/
180
Comparison of configuration highlights
Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS (z06)
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
V23
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickV23
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS (z06) if you care more about power; choose V23 if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS (z06) has a fuel consumption of 8.13, while V23 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS (z06) has a wheelbase of 2.845, while V23 has a wheelbase of 2735. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, V23, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS (z06) uses All Wheel Drive, while V23 uses No data.