iX xDrive40 vs Discovery 3.0L R-Dynamic HSE (360 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
209 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4953 mm
4970 mm
1967 mm
2073 mm
1695 mm
1846 mm
3000 mm
2923 mm
500 L
258 L
Fuel Economy
/
9.2 Km/L
/
89 L
/
9.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
326 BHP - 619 BHP
249 BHP - 355 BHP
TBD
TBD
Electric
Gasoline
TBD
/
5 Seater
5 Seater - 7 Seater
/
2.0 L - 3.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
326 BHP
355 BHP
630 Nm
500 Nm
/
3.0 L
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
iX xDrive40
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Discovery 3.0L R-Dynamic HSE (360 HP)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDiscovery 3.0L R-Dynamic HSE (360 HP)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose iX xDrive40 if you care more about interior space; choose Discovery 3.0L R-Dynamic HSE (360 HP) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, iX xDrive40 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Discovery 3.0L R-Dynamic HSE (360 HP) has a fuel consumption of 10.87. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, iX xDrive40 has a wheelbase of 3000 mm, while Discovery 3.0L R-Dynamic HSE (360 HP) has a wheelbase of 2923 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, iX xDrive40, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. iX xDrive40 uses All Wheel Drive, while Discovery 3.0L R-Dynamic HSE (360 HP) uses All Wheel Drive.