iX xDrive40 vs EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
260 km/h
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4953 mm
5125 mm
1967 mm
2157 mm
1695 mm
1718 mm
3000 mm
3210 mm
500 L
645 L
/
5 Doors
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
326 BHP - 619 BHP
357 BHP - 650
TBD
1-speed direct drive (EV) & Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
Electric
Electric
TBD
485 km - 700 km
5 Seater
5 - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Electric
326 BHP
357 BHP
630 Nm
800 Nm
Motor
/
10
/
options.Lithium-ion
/
265 kW
Comparison of configuration highlights
iX xDrive40
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickiX xDrive40
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose iX xDrive40 if you care more about price; choose EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, iX xDrive40 has a fuel consumption of No data, while EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, iX xDrive40 has a wheelbase of 3000 mm, while EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3210 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. iX xDrive40 uses All Wheel Drive, while EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.